Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 09:19

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
A Woman “Failed” to Break the Four-Minute Mile. But the Setup Was the Real Failure. - Slate Magazine
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Google, Scale AI's largest customer, plans split after Meta deal, sources say - CNBC
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
2025 NBA Finals: 4 things to watch for in Game 3 - NBA
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Can AI replace architects and interior designers?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Channel Island pharmacists confirm digestion drug shortage - BBC
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is a housing crisis looming in China?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why does Russia seem so angry over the US and UK missile strikes in Ukraine?